Estudio comparativo del conocimiento de las técnicas de reproducción asistida en estudiantes de medicina de universidades con diferentes idearios éticos y humanísticos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.4Keywords:
Fertilization in vitro, bioethics, students, medical, health personnel, ethics.Abstract
Comparative study of the knowledge of IVF in medical students of universities with different ethical and humanistic values
Estudo comparativo do conhecimento das técnicas de reprodução assistida em estudantes de Medicina de universidades com diferentes ideários éticos e humanísticos
In vitro fertilization (IVF) continues to be presented as a relatively simple solution to produce a pregnancy without exposing the medical and ethical problems that this represents. This project consisted of conducting a survey to medical students from three medical schools in Mexico City with different ethical and humanistic ideas with the aim of evaluating knowledge about IVF techniques and their ethical implications. The survey was applied to 404 medical students. Students in schools with personalistic ethics had a greater recognition of the bioethical principles involved in the use of these techniques. Knowledge of the technique and ethical issues involved in assisted reproduction could improve the sensitivity of medical students to ethical dilemmas that arise in their professional practice.
Para citar este artículo / To reference this article / Para citar este artigo
Cantú-Quintanilla G, Vidal-Sentíes C, Marcó-Bach FJ, Camargo-Prieto F, Aguiñaga-Chiñas N, Contreras-Estrada D. Estudio comparativo del conocimiento de las técnicas de reproducción asistida en estudiantes de medicina de universidades con diferentes idearios éticos y humanísticos. Pers Bioet. 2020;24(2):166-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.4
Recibido: 04/09/2019
Aceptado: 05/08/2020
Publicado: 27/11/2020
Downloads
References
Paulson MD. Pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technology. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pregnancy-outcome-after-assisted-reproductive-technology
Paulson, MD. In vitro fertilization. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/in-vitro-fertilization
Ombelet W et al. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):605-21. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn042
Brecina PR, Zhao Y. The ethical, legal and social issues impacted by modern assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012:686253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/686253
Marcó J. Dilemas pediátricos de la reproducción asistida. En Véliz Pintos RA, editor. Bioética y humanismo para pediatría. México: Graphimedic; 2018. p. 515-25.
Mitsiakos K et al. A case of Adams-Oliver Syndrome following in vitro fertilization. Human Reprod. 2009;24:1529-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep096
Hansen M et al. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330-53. http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt006
Lu Y, Wang N and Jin F. Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(5):359-371. DOI : http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1200348
Qin J et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1492-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.018
Fortunato A, Tosti E. The impact of in vitro fertilization on health of the children: An update. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. Reprod Biol. 2011;154:125-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.10.012
Odom LN, Segars J. Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17:517-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0b013e32834040a3
Goisis A et al. Medically assisted reproduction and birth outcomes: A within-family analysis using finnish population registers. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1225-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31863-4
Nastri CO et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: Pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):377-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14684
Pandey S et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms018
Chen M, Heilbronn LK. The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8(4):388-402. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174417000228
Kawwass JF, Badell ML. Maternal and fetal risk associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):763-72. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002786
Qin J et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007
Dyer S et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(7):1588-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew082
Spar DL. The baby business: How money, science and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston: Harvard Business School; 2006. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1172/JCI29554
Davies MJ et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(19):1803-13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1206859
López Moratalla N, Huera Zepeda A, Bueno López D. Riesgos para la salud de los nacidos por las técnicas de fecundación asistida. La punta de un iceberg. Rev Cuad Bioét. 2012;XXIII(78). Disponible en: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2012/23/78/467.pdf
Pérez-Tamayo, R. La ley, la ética médica y los trasplantes. Rev Invest Clin. 2005;57(2):170-6. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revinvcli/nn-2005/nn052j.pdf
García JJ. Bioética personalista y bioética principialista. Perspectivas. Cuad Bioét. 2013;24(1):67-76. Disponible en: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2013/24/80/67.pdf
García-Sánchez E. ¿Es un acto de amor humano la fecundación in vitro? Una propuesta de análisis ético. Cuad Bioét. 2014;XXV(83):169-83. Disponible en: https://www.bioeticaweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/amoryfivet.pdf
Sánchez Ramírez N, Carrillo Bermúdez L, Sanabria Arias AM, & Olivella Mejía L. Reducción embrionaria en embarazo gemelar. Rev Cubana Obstet Gineco. 2019; 45(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2019000200015
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Persona y Bioética
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
