Análisis bioético del uso de la biotecnología genómica en la nutrición traslacional

Ana Laura de la Garza; Yael Zonenszain-Laiter

doi:10.5294/pebi.2022.26.2.4

Autores

Ana Laura de la Garza Autor Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-903X
Yael Zonenszain-Laiter Autor Universidad Anáhuac https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-4921

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2022.26.2.4

Palavras-chave:

bioética del cuidado, pessoa, genômica nutricional, liberdade, verdade

Resumo

Os progressos da biotecnologia e as fascinantes perspectivas da genômica nutricional no cenário da prática clínica conduzem à consideração de diferentes aspectos que impactam no benefício integral do ser humano. Nesse sentido, a integração da nutrição personalizada no atendimento clínico requer de uma análise bioética centralizada na unidade da pessoa que, com base em seu perfil nutrigenético único, contribua para o cuidado da saúde por meio do tratamento nutricional individualizado. A análise bioética contempla os princípios de totalidade terapêutica, liberdade e integridade. Além disso, o uso das provas nutrigenéticas destaca não somente a confidencialidade de dados, que se pressupõe, mas sim que leva a considerar o direito à intimidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Glass S, Fanzo J. Genetic modification technology for nutrition and improving diets: an ethical perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017 apr 1;44:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.005

Mathers JC. Nutrigenomics in the modern era. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 ago 7;76(03):265-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966511600080X

Duque RE. Capítulo IV. El derecho a la intimidad de la información genética. Ética biomédica Aspectos sociales de la biomedicina. EUNSA; Pamplona; 2019. p. 231-85.

Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:bmj.k2173. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2173

Kohlmeier M, De Caterina R, Ferguson LR, Görman U, Allayee H, Prasad C, et al. Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalized Nutrition: Part 2 - Ethics, Challenges and Endeavors of Precision Nutrition. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2016;9(1):28-46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446347

Grimaldi KA, van Ommen B, Ordovas JM, Parnell LD, Mathers JC, Bendik I, et al. Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice. Genes Nutr. 2017;12(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0

Fenech M. Genome health nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics – diagnosis and nutritional treatment of genome damage on an individual basis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46(4):1365-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.06.035

Ferguson LR, De Caterina R, Görman U, Allayee H, Kohlmeier M, Prasad C, et al. Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalised Nutrition: Part 1 - Fields of Precision Nutrition. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2016;9(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445350

Roqué MV, Macpherson I, Gonzalvo Cirac M. El principio de precaución y los límites en biomedicina. Persona y Bioética. 2015;19(1):129-39. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2015.19.1.10

González AM. Naturaleza y dignidad personal desde el pensamiento de Robert Spaemann. El primado de la persona en la moral contemporánea: XVII Simposio Internacional de Teología de la Universidad de Navarra / edición dirigida por Augusto Sarmiento [et al.], Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1997, 215-224

Hesketh J. Personalised nutrition: how far has nutrigenomics progressed? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 oct 24;67:430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.145

Carbonell C, Flamarique L. De simios, cyborgs y dioses. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva; 2016. págs. 1-284.

García Cuadrado JA. Antropología filosófica: una introducción a la filosofía del hombre. Pamplona: EUNSA; 2010. 15-255.

German-Zurriaráin R. Los límites éticos: ¿avance o retroceso? Persona y Bioética. 2017;21(2):233-42. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2017.21.2.4

Yepes R. Fundamentos de Antropología: un ideal de la excelencia humana. Pamplona: EUNSA;1996. 1-373 .

Flores M, Glusman G, Brogaard K, Price ND, Hood L. P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Per Med. 2013;10(6):565–76. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.13.57

Mathes WF, Kelly SA, Pomp D. Advances in comparative genetics: influence of genetics on obesity. Br J Nutr. 2011 oct;106 Suppl 1:S1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511001905

Lopez Moratalla N. Biología y ética de la bioética: la urgente necesidad de realismo. Cuad Bioética. 2013;24(2):251-64.

Sarah R. Se hace tarde y anochece. Madrid; PALABRA. 2019. 247-258.

San-Cristobal R, Milagro FI, Martínez JA. Future Challenges and Present Ethical Considerations in the Use of Personalized Nutrition Based on Genetic Advice. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(11):1447-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.05.028

Fayos Febrer R. Personalist bioethics in the Romano Guardini’s thought. Cuad Bioet. 2014;25(83):159-68.

Spaemann R, Spaemann R. ¿Es todo ser humano una persona? Pers y derecho Rev Fundam las Inst Jurídicas y Derechos Humanos. 1997;(37):9-24.

Camp KM, Trujillo E. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutritional Genomics. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 feb 1;114(2):299-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.001

Bernhardt BA, Zayac C, Gordon ES, Wawak L, Pyeritz RE, Gollust SE. Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians. Per Med. 2012 sep 1;9(7):683-92. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.12.80

Bergmann MM, Bodzioch M, Bonet ML, Defoort C, Lietz G, Mathers JC. Bioethics in human nutrigenomics research: European Nutrigenomics Organisation workshop report. Br J Nutr. 2006;95(5):1024-1027. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20061758

Buitendijk GHS, Amin N, Hofman A, van Duijn CM, Vingerling JR, Klaver CCW. Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 oct 2;55(10):6167-74. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15142

Janssens ACJW, Bunnik EM, Burke W, Schermer MHN. Uninformed consent in nutrigenomic research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 jul 10;25(7):789-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.63

Borry P, van Hellemondt RE, Sprumont D, Jales CFD, Rial-Sebbag E, Spranger TM, et al. Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 jul 25;20(7):715-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.278

Lombo J. La persona y su naturaleza: Tomás de Aquino y Leonardo Polo. Anu Filosófico. 1996;29(55):721-39.

Dietrich L. La libertad humana como valor primordial en Tomás de Aquino. Teol y Vida. 2004;XLV:531-8.

Langley-Evans SC, McMullen S. Developmental origins of adult disease. Med Princ Pract. 2010;19(2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000273066

Duque RE. Capítulo V. Determinismo, indeterminismo y finalidad. Ética biomédica Aspectos sociales de la biomedicina. EUNSA, Pamplona; 2019. p. 287–350.

Goodarzi MO. Genetics of obesity: what genetic association studies have taught us about the biology of obesity and its complications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;6(3):223-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30200-0

de Roos B. Personalised nutrition: ready for practice? Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 feb 12;72(1):48-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665112002844

Thomas N. Beyond the Barker hypothesis and the thrifty genotype - The womb, ethnicity, genes and the environment - Recent perspectives on the evolution of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome in India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 dic;16(Suppl 2):S142-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.104024

Walley AJ, Asher JE, Froguel P. The genetic contribution to non-syndromic human obesity. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(7):431-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2594

Thomassen Hammerstad G, Sarangi S, Bjørnevoll I. Diagnostic uncertainties, ethical tensions, and accounts of role responsibilities in genetic counseling communication. J Genet Couns. 2020;29(6):1159-1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1282

Fallaize R, Macready AL, Butler LT, Ellis JA, Lovegrove JA. An insight into the public acceptance of nutrigenomic-based personalised nutrition. Nutr Res Rev. 2013;26(1):39-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422413000024

Ramos-López O, Milagro FI, Allayee H, Chmurzynska A, Choi MS, Curi R, et al. Guide for current nutrigenetic, nutrigenomic, and nutriepigenetic approaches for precision nutrition involving the prevention and management of chronic diseases associated with obesity. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2017;10(1-2):43-62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477729

De Boo HA, Harding JE. The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;46(1):4-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00506.x

Sols F. Certeza razonable en ciencia y filosofía. Sci Fides. 2016;4(2):483-99. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2016.041

Álvarez-Martínez H, Pérez-Campos E. Causalidad en medicina. Gac Med Mex. 2004;140(4):467-72.

Santos JL, De la Cruz R, Holst C, Grau K, Naranjo C, Maiz A, et al. Allelic Variants of Melanocortin 3 Receptor Gene (MC3R) and Weight Loss in Obesity: A Randomised Trial of Hypo-Energetic High- versus Low-Fat Diets. PLoS One. 2011 jun 14;6(6):e19934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019934

Chang CS, Lu YJ, Chang HH, Hsu SH, Kuo PH, Shieh CC, et al. Role of adiponectin gene variants, adipokines and hydrometry-based percent body fat in metabolically healthy and abnormal obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016;12(1):49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2016.05.003

Tan PY, Mitra SR, Amini F. Lifestyle Interventions for Weight Control Modified by Genetic Variation: A Review of the Evidence. Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(5-6):169-85. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499854

de Siqueira JE. El Principio De Responsabilidad De Hans Jonas. Acta Bioeth. 2001;7(2):277-85.