ANTIGONE AND ARISTOTLE: INTERPRETING TWO VOICES ON THE AMBIGUITY OF THE TECHNIQUE

Authors

  • Joaquín García-Huidobro Author Universidad de Los Andes, Chile
  • Constanza Giménez Author Universidad de Los Andes, Chile
  • Diego Honorato Author Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Keywords:

Ethical relativism, technique, Sophocles, Antigone, Aristotle (Source, DeCS, Bireme).

Abstract

In the "Ode to Man," in Antigone,Sophocles stressed the moral ambiguity of the technique. Since it can be used for both good and bad, it requires a higher guidance, one represented by divine law. This theme is taken up by Aristotle, but on a secular basis, with his idea that some things are right or wrong by nature. For Aristotle, the straight orientation of the technique does not depend primarily on knowledge of certain ethical rules, but on the formation of character, since knowledge of what is good depends on the moral disposition of the subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Joaquín García-Huidobro, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Grupo de Investigación en Filosofía Práctica

Universidad de los Andes

Santiago de Chile

Constanza Giménez, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Grupo de Investigación en Filosofía Práctica

Universidad de los Andes

Santiago de Chile

Diego Honorato, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Grupo de Investigación en Filosofía Práctica

Universidad de los Andes

Santiago de Chile

Published

2015-11-13

How to Cite

García-Huidobro, J., Giménez, C., & Honorato, D. (2015). ANTIGONE AND ARISTOTLE: INTERPRETING TWO VOICES ON THE AMBIGUITY OF THE TECHNIQUE. Persona Y Bioética, 19(2). Retrieved from https://personaybioetica.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/personaybioetica/article/view/5427

Issue

Section

Articles