Shared Decision-Making at The End of Life: A Qualitative Study from Clinical Bioethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2025.29.2.2Keywords:
Shared decision-making, palliative care, bioethics, personal autonomy, right to die, family, moral personhoodAbstract
The aim of this study was to explore how patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals experience shared decision-making at the end of life from a clinical bioethics perspective. The study employed an exploratory qualitative design with an interpretive approach, based on semi-structured interviews conducted with patients with advanced illness, primary caregivers, and palliative care professionals. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Five themes emerged from the findings: clinical deterioration as a practical limit to autonomy; the family as mediator and decision-maker; the healthcare professional as translator and moral steward; clinical urgency as a barrier to deliberation; and decision-making as a process of progressive assent. In conclusion, relational autonomy and progressive assent help safeguard human dignity and legitimize complex clinical decisions at the end of life.
Downloads
References
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8.a ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640873.001.0001
Cherny NI, Radbruch L; Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009;23(7):581-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216309107024
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
Bélanger E, Rodríguez C, Groleau D. Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis. Palliat Med. 2011;25(3):242-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216310389348
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2476-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.19.2476
Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):741-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2
Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editores. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Nueva York: Oxford University Press; 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195123333.001.0001
Gómez-Vírseda C, de Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00495-1
Foo KF, Lin YP, Lin CP, Chen YC. Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model. J Med Ethics. 2024;50(11):739-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109818
Surbone A. Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16(3):235-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0366-0
Tripodoro VA, Veloso VI, Víbora Martín E, Kodba-Čeh H, Bakan M, Rasmussen BH, et al. ‘Someone must do it’: multiple views on family’s role in end-of-life care – an international qualitative study. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024;18:26323524241260425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241260425
Laryionava K, Pfeil TA, Dietrich M, Reiter-Theil S, Hiddemann W, Winkler EC. The second patient? Family members of cancer patients and their role in end-of-life decision making. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0288-2
Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):953-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181659096
Gastmans C. Dignity-enhancing nursing care: a foundational ethical framework. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20(2):142-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733012473772
Tronto J. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. Nueva York: Routledge; 1993.
Morberg Jämterud S. Acknowledging vulnerability in ethics of palliative care – a feminist ethics approach. Nurs Ethics. 2022;29(4):952-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211072361
Epstein RM, Street RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):100-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1239
Restrepo-Martínez M, Escobar MF, Rojas NA, Hernández-Pinzón J, Ramos D, van Bruchem-Visser RL. Decision making in the end-of-life care of patients who are terminally ill with cancer – a qualitative descriptive study with a phenomenological approach from the experience of healthcare workers. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00768-5
Pinto KRD, Ertler LZ, Rego F, Nunes R. Bioethics and hospital palliative care: a systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025;15(5):564-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005021
Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 4.a ed. Londres: Sage; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036234386
Kvale S, Brinkmann S. InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3.a ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage; 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Murray SA, Kendall M, Boyd K, Sheikh A. Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ. 2005;330(7498):1007-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1007
Sudore RL, Lum HD, You JJ, Hanson LC, Meier DE, Pantilat SZ, et al. Defining advance care planning for adults: a consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):821-32.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331
Sulmasy DP. Dignity and bioethics: history, theory, and selected applications. En: Schulman A, editor. Human dignity and bioethics: essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Washington, DC: The President’s Council on Bioethics; 2008. p. 469-501.
Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Young JP, Vig LK, Reinke LF, Wenrich MD, et al. An approach to understanding the interaction of hope and desire for explicit prognostic information among individuals with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(4):610-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2007.0209
Rietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e543-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X
Bélanger E, Rodríguez C, Groleau D, Légaré F, MacDonald ME, Marchand R. Patient participation in palliative care decisions: an ethnographic discourse analysis. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016;11:32438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.32438
Pastrana T, De Lima L, Sánchez-Cárdenas M, Van Steijn D, Garralda E, Pons-Izquierdo JJ, et al. Atlas de Cuidados Paliativos en Latinoamérica 2020. 2.ª ed. Houston: IAHPC Press; 2021.
Collier A, Chapman M. Matters of care and the good death – rhetoric or reality? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2023;17(3):208-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000658
Sledge R, Meyer D, Zubatsky M, Heiden-Rootes K, Philipneri M, Browne T. A systematic literature review of relational autonomy in dialysis decision making. Health Soc Work. 2022;47(1):53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlab042
Borges PJ, Hernández-Marrero P, Martins Pereira S. A bioethical perspective on the meanings behind a wish to hasten death: a meta-ethnographic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2024;25(1):26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01012-4
Featherstone HJ, McQuillan R, Foley G. Healthcare professionals’ perspective on supporting patients and family caregivers in end-of-life care decision-making: a qualitative study in specialist palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025;42(10):1005-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241296860
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kelvin J. Rojas Álvarez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.


