Evaluation of the Principles of Personalist Bioethics in Face Transplantation: A Qualitative Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2024.28.2.5Keywords:
Facial transplantation, bioethics, qualitative research, social impact, decision making, Elio SgrecciaAbstract
The emergence of new therapies has generated a debate about their ethical, medical, and social implications. In this context, ontological personalism has become important in bioethics, because it focuses on safeguarding the human dignity and promoting integral well-being. Its guiding principles are the defense of physical life, the justification of all therapeutic interventions, the demand for the principle of consent, and the consideration of social and justice implications in the allocation of resources. The study was conducted to understand the influence of these principles on the professional practice of healthcare personnel working in transplants. An ethical evaluation guide for interventions on the human body - adapted with the principles of personalist bioethics - was applied both in person and online. Seven experts participated (57% men, average age of 46 years) and the results were analyzed through content and frequency analysis. The results showed that face transplant can improve the recipient's quality of life but is limited by economic costs. Additionally, face transplants comply with the principles of defense of physical human life, of therapeutic benefit, of freedom and responsibility, and of sociability and subsidiarity. Ultimately, the study concludes that face transplants are an optimal and necessary technique for the progress of medicine, but and ethical evaluation is essential to harmonize with scientific and technological advances.
Downloads
References
Marín Conde E, Gómez Tatay L. Guía de valoración ética de intervenciones sobre el cuerpo humano ante la llegada de las tecnologías NBIC con fines de mejoramiento. Cuad Bioét. 2021;32(105):195-211. https://aebioetica.org/revistas/2021/32/ 105/195.pdf
Chapman AR. Inconsistency of human rights approaches to human dignity with transhumanism. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10(7): 61-3.
Burgos Velasco JM. ¿Qué es la bioética personalista? Un análisis de su especificidad y de sus fundamentos teóricos. Cuad Bioét. 2013;24(80):17-30. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/ 875/87527461003.pdf
Paramés Fernández MD. Transhumanismo y bioética: una aproximación al paradigma transhumanista desde la bioética personalista ontológicamente fundada. Vida y Ética. 2016;17(1). https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/1492/1/transhumanismo-bioetica-parames.pdf
Lukac de Stier ML. Respuesta virtuosa del personalismo ontológico a la bioética principista. Vida y Ética. 2010;11(1):181-93. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/1533/1/respuesta-personalismo-ontologico-bioetica.pdf
Sgreccia E. Persona humana y personalismo. Cuad Bioét. 2013;24(80):115-23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/875/87527 461012.pdf
Bound Alberti F, Weins D, Bell Weins A. Listening to face transplant patients and caregivers: how medical humanities approaches redefine surgical ‘success’. Med Humanit. 2024;0:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-013005
Bound F, Ridley M. Face transplants 2003-2021: where are we now and what have we learnt? Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2021;103(8):392-4. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2021.142
Edgar A. The challenge of transplants to an intersubjectively established sense of personal identity. Health Care Anal. 2009; 17(2):123-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0119-y
Winter GF. The ethics of facial transplantation. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98(7):288-92. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.2016.288
Clarke A, Butler PEM. The psychological management of facial transplantation. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009; 9(7):1087-100. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.42
Freeman M, Abou Jaoudé P. Justifying surgery’s last taboo: the ethics of face transplants. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(2):76-81. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.016865
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Guillermo Cantú Quintanilla, Martín Iglesias, Josefina Alberú, Mara Medeiros, Anneke Farías-Yapur, Mariana López Cervantes, Nuria Aguiñaga Chiñas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.


