Philosophical perspectives from the problem of suicide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2021.25.1.4Keywords:
Autonomy, disposition of own body, disposition of own life, suicide, Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel KantAbstract
Many of the actual bioethical discussions start from the assumption that we have absolute dominance/disposition over our body. Based on the thesis of autonomy, control over one's own life and the freedom to do anything, at least with one's body, the goodness or legitimacy of acts such as suicide and euthanasia are often justified. Considering the last statements, this paper seeks to approach the question of the nature of the disposition –main attribute of dominion or property– over the body. It will be argued on the basis of Thomas Aquinas' theory and Immanuel Kant's exposition, often wrongly considered, in my opinion, as rival doctrines. The whole writing will be oriented to review the relations of the modern principle of autonomy with the problem of the morality of suicide.
Downloads
References
Schooyans M. Bioética y población. La elección de la vida. México: Instituto Mexicano de Doctrina Social Cristiana; 1995.
Kant I. Lecciones de Ética. Barcelona: Austral; 2017.
Guardini R. Ética: lecciones en la universidad de Múnich. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos; 2010.
Regalado A. China’s CRISPR babies: Read exclusive excerpts from the unseen original research. MIT Tech Rev. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/03/131752/chinas-crispr-babies-read-exclusive-excerpts-he-jiankui-paper/
Aquino T. Suma Teológica. Navarra: Universidad de Navarra; n.d.
Aquino T. Comentario al libro Del alma de Aristóteles. Buenos Aires: Arché; 1979.
Beuchot M. Cuerpo y alma en el hilemorfismo de Santo Tomás. REFIME. 1993;(0):39-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v0i.9931
Calipari M. Curarse y hacerse curar. Entre el abandono del paciente y el encarnizamiento terapéutico. Buenos Aires: Editorial de la Universidad Católica Argentina; 2007.
Ugarte J. Curso de Filosofía del Derecho. Tomo I. Santiago: Ediciones UC; 2010.
Informe Belmont. Comisión Nacional para la protección de los Sujetos Humanos de Investigación Biomédica y del Comportamiento. Estados Unidos: 1979.
Martínez J. Sobre el principio de autonomía en bioética. Rev Bioét. 2011;5:29-38.
Rhonheimer M. Natural Law as a “work of reason”: Understanding the metaphysics of participated theonomy. Am J Juris. 2010;55(1): 41-77. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article-abstract/55/1/41/232719?redirectedFrom=PDF
Reath A. Agency and autonomy in Kant’s moral theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Engelhardt T. Los fundamentos de la bioética. Barcelona: Paidós; 1995.
Blázquez N. Bioética. La nueva ciencia de la vida. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos; 2000.
Kant I. La metafísica de las costumbres. Madrid: Tecnos; 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Persona y Bioética
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.