Philosophical perspectives from the problem of suicide

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2021.25.1.4

Keywords:

Autonomy, disposition of own body, disposition of own life, suicide, Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant

Abstract

Many of the actual bioethical discussions start from the assumption that we have absolute dominance/disposition over our body. Based on the thesis of autonomy, control over one's own life and the freedom to do anything, at least with one's body, the goodness or legitimacy of acts such as suicide and euthanasia are often justified. Considering the last statements, this paper seeks to approach the question of the nature of the disposition –main attribute of dominion or property– over the body. It will be argued on the basis of Thomas Aquinas' theory and Immanuel Kant's exposition, often wrongly considered, in my opinion, as rival doctrines. The whole writing will be oriented to review the relations of the modern principle of autonomy with the problem of the morality of suicide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Schooyans M. Bioética y población. La elección de la vida. México: Instituto Mexicano de Doctrina Social Cristiana; 1995.

Kant I. Lecciones de Ética. Barcelona: Austral; 2017.

Guardini R. Ética: lecciones en la universidad de Múnich. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos; 2010.

Regalado A. China’s CRISPR babies: Read exclusive excerpts from the unseen original research. MIT Tech Rev. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/12/03/131752/chinas-crispr-babies-read-exclusive-excerpts-he-jiankui-paper/

Aquino T. Suma Teológica. Navarra: Universidad de Navarra; n.d.

Aquino T. Comentario al libro Del alma de Aristóteles. Buenos Aires: Arché; 1979.

Beuchot M. Cuerpo y alma en el hilemorfismo de Santo Tomás. REFIME. 1993;(0):39-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21071/refime.v0i.9931

Calipari M. Curarse y hacerse curar. Entre el abandono del paciente y el encarnizamiento terapéutico. Buenos Aires: Editorial de la Universidad Católica Argentina; 2007.

Ugarte J. Curso de Filosofía del Derecho. Tomo I. Santiago: Ediciones UC; 2010.

Informe Belmont. Comisión Nacional para la protección de los Sujetos Humanos de Investigación Biomédica y del Comportamiento. Estados Unidos: 1979.

Martínez J. Sobre el principio de autonomía en bioética. Rev Bioét. 2011;5:29-38.

Rhonheimer M. Natural Law as a “work of reason”: Understanding the metaphysics of participated theonomy. Am J Juris. 2010;55(1): 41-77. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article-abstract/55/1/41/232719?redirectedFrom=PDF

Reath A. Agency and autonomy in Kant’s moral theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

Engelhardt T. Los fundamentos de la bioética. Barcelona: Paidós; 1995.

Blázquez N. Bioética. La nueva ciencia de la vida. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos; 2000.

Kant I. La metafísica de las costumbres. Madrid: Tecnos; 2018.

Published

2021-04-27

How to Cite

Reyes Arellano, F. (2021). Philosophical perspectives from the problem of suicide. Persona Y Bioética, 25(1), e2514. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2021.25.1.4

Issue

Section

Reflection Article