Principios éticos en la investigación en pacientes críticos

Javier Rojas-Ávila; Miguel Valencia-Contrera

doi:10.5294/pebi.2023.27.1.7

Autores

Javier Rojas-Ávila Autor Universidad Autónoma de Chile https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2838-358X
Miguel Valencia-Contrera Autor University of Antofagasta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4943-5924

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2023.27.1.7

Palavras-chave:

Ética em Pesquisa, ética, pesquisa, Cuidados Críticos, Unidades de Terapia Intensiva, Revisão

Resumo

O doente crítico é de particular importância no desenvolvimento da investigação devido à perda ou redução da autonomia do doente. O objectivo deste estudo era identificar os princípios éticos de Ezequiel Emanuel como guia no desenvolvimento da investigação em pacientes gravemente doentes. Foi realizada uma revisão integrativa nas bases de dados WoS, PUBMED, SCOPUS e SciELO, foram identificados 545 artigos, dos quais oito preenchiam os critérios previamente definidos. Foi identificada a descrição dos oito princípios de Emanuel, que provou ser um quadro abrangente e sistemático para orientar a conduta ética na população analisada, sendo a validade científica o princípio mais descrito na investigação crítica dos pacientes, seguido pelo princípio do consentimento informado.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras [CIE]. Código de ética del CIE para las enfermeras. Revisado en 2021. CIE; 2021. Accessed October 20, 2022. https://www.icn.ch/system/files/2021-10/ICN_Code-of-Ethics_SP_WEB.pdf

Tarwade P. Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Ethical Attitudes. Indian J Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2022;26(3):259–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24161

Castejón Cruz OA, Hernández Pacheco HL, Núñez Savoff RA, Bush Wood SW. Dilemas éticos en la práctica clínica en las unidades de cuidados intensivos y paros cardiorrespiratorios. Rev Med Hondur [Internet]. 2019;87(1):33-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5377/rmh.v87i1.11936

Estella A. Ética de la investigación en el paciente crítico. Med Intensiva [Internet]. 2018;42(4):247-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2017.11.006

Khan AS, Sattar A, Khan H. Providing critical care in ethical way. Traditions and ethics should go hand in hand. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care [Internet]. 2020;24(6):568-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v24i6.1394

Applefeld WN, Wang J, Klein HG, Danner RL, Eichacker PQ, Natanson C. Comparative effectiveness research in critically ill patients: risks associated with mischaracterising usual care. Crit Care Resusc [Internet]. 2020;22(2):110-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.r1

Latour-Pérez J. Investigación en el enfermo crítico. Dificultades y perspectivas. Med Intensiv [Internet]. 2018;42(3):184-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2017.07.008

Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady CC. What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research. J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2004;189(5):930-937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/381709

Crossetti MGO. Revisión integrativa de la investigación en enfermería, el rigor científico que se le exige. Rev Gaúcha Enferm [Internet]. 2012;33(2):10-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-14472012000200002

Ranse J. Research in the context of coronavirus disease 2019: Considerations for critical care environments. Aust Crit Care [Internet]. 2020;33(4):309-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.06.004

Paquette ED, Derrington SF, Shukla A, Sinha N, Oswald S, Sorce L, et al. Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics [Internet]. 2018;13(4):391-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618782231

Krutsinger DC, Halpern SD, DeMartino ES. Conflicts of interest in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2018;44(10):1765-1766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5335-1

Dahlberg J, Eriksen C, Robertsen A, Beitland S. Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med [Internet]. 2020;28:51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00732-x

Broström L, Johansson M. The protection of unrepresented patients in emergency care research. Account Res [Internet]. 2018;25(1):21-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1404458

Alconada Magliano JP. La investigación en medicina crítica como herramienta para el autoaprendizaje y la mejora de la calidad de vida de la comunidad. Lodovica Pediátr [Internet]. 2021;24(2):40-43. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1363146

Emanuel EJ, Grady CC, Crouch RA, Lie RK, Miller FG, Wendler DD. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Nueva York: Oxford University Press; 2008. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-textbook-of-clinical-research-ethics-9780199768639?cc=co&lang=en

Pérez de Arenaza D, Pizarro R. Sesgo de inmortalidad en estudios observacionales. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam [Internet]. 2021;51(2):125-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52787/AJUJ5684

Vail EA, Gershengorn HB, Wunsch H, Walkey AJ. Attention to Immortal Time Bias in Critical Care Research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2021;203(10):1222-1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202008-3238CP

Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haar MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes un randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA [Internet]. 2004;291(20):2457-2465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.20.2457

Charlesworth M, Foëx BA. Qualitative research in critical care: Has its time finally come? J Intensive Care Soc [Internet]. 2016;17(2):146-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143715609955

Sánchez Flores FA. Fundamentos epistémicos de la investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa: consensos y disensos. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria [Internet]. 2019;13(1):101-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2019.644

Oliveros Rodríguez H, Buitrago G, Castellanos Saavedra P. Utilización de los métodos de emparejamiento en estudios observacionales con pacientes críticos y desenlaces renales. Revisión exploratoria. Colombian J Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2021;49(2):e944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e944

Bench S, O’Shea A, Boaz A. Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects. Nurs Res [Internet]. 2020;69(5):367-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000443

London AJ. Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency. Bioethics [Internet]. 2019;33(3):326-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12467

Lewis A, Caplan A. Response to a trial on reversal of Death by Neurologic Criteria. Crit Care [Internet]. 2016;20:e377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1561-5

Blackwood B, Marshall J, Rose L. Progress on core outcome sets for critical care research. Curr Opin Crit Care [Internet]. 2015;21(5):439-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000232

Citerio G, Bakker J, Brochard L, Buchman TG, Jaber S, Mazzone PJ, et al. Critical care journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and responsibilities. Intensive Care Med [Internet]. 2020;46(8):1521-1523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06155-7

Frampton G, Woods L, Scott DA. Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(10):e0258935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258935

Saikia P, Thakuria B. Retraction of papers authored by Yuhji Saitoh – Beyond the Fujii phenomenon. Indian J Anaesth [Internet]. 2019;63(7):571-584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_267_19