Reinventing bioethics in a post-humanist and post-truth society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2018.22.2.2Keywords:
Bioethics, post-humanism, post-truth, crisis, human characteristics, human nature, biotechnologyAbstract
Bioethics is going through a rough patch in the midst of a society that seems to run away very fast from true ethical and humanistic values. Post-humanism presents a new model of the human being, one that dispenses with the principles and concepts that have been employed so far by humanity. The discourse in bioethics presents this model without any relationship to the anthropology that has been used for centuries and does so in a way that is totally lacking in ethical references. These dissimilarities reflect a misrepresented academic perspective that belongs to a post-truth era. Concepts such as dignity, human nature, quality of life, respect for life and vulnerability are not well understood. When it comes to decision-making on the so-called bioethical dilemmas, it lays out a new biotechnologically improved version of man that prevails over real health and biological concerns that need to be solved.
Downloads
References
Dawson A. The future of bioethics: three dogmas and a cup of hemlock. Bioethics 24(5):218-25 · June 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01814.x
Callahan DA. Bioethics crisis? Bioethics: forum essay. EU; The Hasting Center: 2008. Available in: http://www.thehasti.ngscenter.org/a-bioethics-crisis/
Pardo A. 2010. Cuestiones básicas de bioética. Spain: RIALP.
Maldonado CE. Crisis of bioethics and bioethics in the midst of crises. Rev Latinoam Bioet., 12(22): 112-123. 2015. Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=127025434009
De Santiago M. Prólogo to bioética ¿El hombre contra el hombre? In: Poisson JF. Madrid: RIALP; 2009.
Oxford Dictionary. 2016. Available in: www.oxforddictionaries.com
Poisson JF. Bioética ¿El hombre contra el hombre? Madrid: RIALP; 2009.
Jonas H. Técnica, medicina y ética. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós; 1997.
Morin E. El Método 5. La humanidad de la humanidad. La identidad humana. 6ª ed. Madrid: Cátedra; 2006.
Chavarría AG. Posthumanism and changes in human identity. Rev. Reflexiones 2015; 94 (1): 97-107. Available in: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-28592015000100097
Potter VR. Bioethics. Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1971.
González AM. En busca de la naturaleza perdida, estudios de bioética fundamental. Spain: EUNSA; 2000.
Barrio-Maestre JM. La Bioética ha muerto. ¡Viva la ética médica! Cuad. Bioet. 2015; XXVI(1): 25-49. Available in: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2015/26/86/25.pdf
Zanc I, Lupu I. Posthumanism and bioethics. Rev. Romana Bioet. 2007; 5(1) 20-32.
Hayles K. How we became posthuman. Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: University Press; 1999.
Chan S. How to rethink the fourteen-day rule. Hastings Center Report. 2017; 47: 5–6. doi:10.1002/hast.698 / Brivanlou A. Is it time to move the moral line in research in the human embryo? Hastings Center Newsletter: June 6, 2017.
Potter VR. Bioethics, the science of survival. In: Perspectives in biology and medicine. John Hopkins University Press; 1970: 14(1): 127.
Güell-Pelayo F. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation assisted reproductive technologies and the principle of procreative beneficence. Cuad Bioet. 2014; Sept-Dec; 25(85):427-43. Available in: http://aebioetica.org/revistas/2014/25/85/427.pdf
Ghafoori F, Vedadhir A, Golian Tehrani S. Ethical issues of embryo genetic manipulation. Med Ethics J. 2016; 10(36): 35-45. Available in: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/en-me/article/view/13369
Jonas H. El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder; 1995.
Fukuyama F. Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Picador; 2002.
Heidegger M. Serenity. Barcelona: Odós; 1989.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Persona y Bioética

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.


