Ética e bioética no mundo científico: uma revisão integrativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.3Keywords:
Scientific misconduct, research, plagiarism, ethics, scientific publication ethics.Abstract
Ética y bioética en el mundo científico: una revisión integradora de la literatura
Ethics and Bioethics in the Scientific World: An Integrative Review
This paper studies the reality of ethical and bioethical issues in the scientific world through an integrative literature review of articles included in three databases. Seven terms from the thesaurus Health Sciences Descriptors were used, from which three combinations were elaborated and used in the three databases. After applying inclusion requirements, a total of 18 articles were selected. Certain misconducts, particularly plagiarism, falsification and data fabrication, have been showing an increasing behavior, which requires more stringent measures in order to control such phenomenon and maintain scientific credibility before society and authorities.
Para citar este artículo / To reference this article / Para citar este artigo
Souza-Júnior EV, Rosa RS, Guedes TP, Silva CS, Ribeiro DB, Balbinote FS, Souza DF, Teixeira RB, Silva-Filho BF, Sawanda NO. Ética e bioética no mundo científico: uma revisão integrativa. Pers bioet. 2020;24(2):151-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2020.24.2.3
Recibido: 30/06/2020
Aceptado: 28/07/2020
Publicado: 27/11/2020
Downloads
References
Pádua GCC, Guilherm D. Integridade científica e pesquisa em saúde no Brasil: revisão da literatura. Rev bioét. 2015;23(1):124-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422015231053
Okonta P, Rossouw T. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Dev world bioethics. 2013;13(3):149-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x
Aznar DC, Freitas-Aznar AR, Capelari MM, Aznar FDC, Sales-Peres SHC. Neutralidade científica: aspectos éticos na obtenção de resultados. Rev latinoam bioét. 2017;17(2):31-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.1899
Rai R, Sabharwal S. Retracted publications in orthopaedics: Prevalence, characteristics, and trends. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(9):e44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01116
Koerich MS, Machado RR, Costa E. Ética e bioética: para dar início à reflexão. Texto & contexto enferm. 2005;4(1):6-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072005000100014
Selli L, Garrafa V. Bioética, solidariedade crítica e vonluntariado orgânico. Rev Saúde Pública. 2005;39(3):473-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102005000300020
Mapengo MAA, Sales-Peres SHC, Sales-Peres A. Bioethics criteria in Dentistry research of humans. Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2018;66(4):289-95. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720180004000011295
Garrafa V, Martorell LB, Nascimento WF. Críticas ao principialismo em bioética: perspectivas desde o norte e desde o sul. Saude soc. 2016;25(2):442-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902016150801
Camacho ACLF, Abreu LTA, Mata ACO, Leite BS, Santos RC. As questões bioéticas do idoso e seus aspectos relevantes para a enfermagem: revisão integrativa. Rev enferm UFPE on line. 2013;7(esp):945-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5205/reuol.3934-31164-1-SM.0703esp201315
Souza Junior EV, Silva VSB, Lozado YA, Bomfim ES, Alves JP, Boery EN et al. Dilemas bioéticos na assistência médica às gestantes adolescentes. Rev Bioét. 2018;26(1):87-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422018261229
Ercole FF, Melo LS, Alcoforado CLGC. Integrative review versus systematic review. Rev Min Enferm. 2014;18(1):9-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1415-2762.20140001
Reyes BH. Problemas éticos en las publicaciones científicas. Rev méd Chile. 2018;146(3):373-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872018000300373
Torres KO, Michel MT. Retracción de artículos biomédicos y sus implicaciones éticas. Rev latinoam bioét. 2018;18(2):100-25. Disponible en: https://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rlbi/article/view/3446
Schonhaut BL. Integridad y conductas inapropiadas en investigación biomédica. Rev chil pediatr. 2019;90(2):217-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32641/rchped.v90i2.1034
Zunic L, Masic I. What pharmacy practitioners need to know about ethics in scientific publishing. J Res Pharm Pract. 2014;3(4):112-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2279-042X.145356
Nogueira TE, Gonçalves AS, Leles CR, Batista AC, Costa LR. A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2576-y
Lins L, Carvalho FM. Scientific integrity in Brazil. J Bioeth Inq. 2014;11(3):283-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9539-y
Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S. Plagiarism: an egregious form of misconduct. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(2):77-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.152084
Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Seksenbayev B, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(8):1220-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220
Lazarides MK, Gougoudi E, Papanas N. Pitfalls and misconducts in medical writing. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019;18(4):350-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534734619870083
Chambers LM, Michener CM, Falcone T. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG 2019;126:1134-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15689
Dhingra D, Mishra D. Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2014;1;11(2):104-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2014.026
Rivera H. Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(2):e6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e6
Almeida RM, Albuquerque RK, Catelani F, Fontes-Pereira AJ, Vasconcelos SM. Plagiarism allegations account for most retractions in major Latin American/Caribbean databases. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016;22(5):1447-56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9714-5
Artino Junior AR, Driessen EW, Maggio LA. Ethical Shades of Gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):76-84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
Russo M. Ética e integridade na ciência: da responsabilidade do cientista à responsabilidade coletiva. Estud av.2014;28(80):189-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142014000100016
Bianchetti L, Machado AMN. PUBLICAR & MORRER!? Análise do impacto das políticas de pesquisa e pós-graduação na constituição do tempo de trabalho dos investigadores. ESC [internet]. 2009 [acesso 2020 jul. 27];(28):53-69. Disponível em: https://www.fpce.up.pt/ciie/revistaesc/ESC28/28_lucidio.pdf
Ferreira ACSP. As condições de trabalho dos professores-pesquisadores e o processo de produção do conhecimento na pós-graduação stricto sensu em educação [dissertação]. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2015 [acesso 2020 jul. 27]. Disponível em: https://www.locus.ufv.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/19418/texto %20completo.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson DM, Malik M et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 1998;351(9103):637-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0
Vasconcellos-Silva PR, Castiel LD, Griep RH. A sociedade de risco midiatizada, o movimento antivacinação e o risco do autismo. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2015;20(2):607-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015202.10172014
Aps LRMM, Piantola MAF, Pereira SA, Castro JT, Santos FAO, Ferreira LCS. Eventos adversos de vacinas e as consequências da não vacinação: uma análise crítica. Rev Saúde Pública. 2018;52:40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000384
Rosales SPL. Salud y epidemiología de las infecciones. Breves historias enlazadas. Rev Fac Med [internet]. 2016 [acesso 2019 dez, 21];59(1):32-5. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0026-17422016000100032&lng=es
Fang FC, Steen G, Casadevall A. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. PNAS. 2012;109(42):17028-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Committee of Publication Ethics. Retraction guidelines [internet] 2019 [acesso 2019 dez. 23]. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction-guidelines.pdf
Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope). Diretrizes para prática da boa publicação: relatório 2003 do comitê de ética da publicação (Cope). Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 2005;17(2):264-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872005000200017
Wiley. Comitê de Ética em Publicações (Cope). [internet] [acesso 2020 jul. 27]. Disponível em: https://authorservices.wiley.com/editors/ethical-guidelines/committee-on-publication-ethics-(cope)/index.html
Committee on Publication Ethics (Cope). Torne-se um membro [internet] [acesso 2020 jul. 27]. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/join-cope
Wang J, Ku JC, Alotaibi NM, Rutka JT. Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:809-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.014
Committee on Publication Ethics. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing [internet] 2018 [acesso 2019 dez. 21]. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
Sugawara Y, Tanimoto T, Miyagawa S, Murakami M, Tsuya A, Tanaka A et al. Scientific Misconduct and Social Media: Role of Twitter in the Stimulus Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency Cells Scandal. J Med Internet Res. 2017;28;19(2):e57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6706
Novaes MRCGi, Rodrigues CS, Guilhem DB. Integridade científica e direitos autorais nos códigos de ética profissional. Rev Bioét. 2018; 26(3):387-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422018263258
Bertoglia MP, Águila AA. Revistas depredadoras: una nueva amenaza a las publicaciones científicas. Rev méd Chile. 2018; 146(2):206-12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872018000200206
Fanelli D, Costas R, Larivière V. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
Bülow W, Helgesson G. Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Med Health Care Philos. 2019;22(2):245-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9865-7
Bhutta ZA, Crane J. Should research fraud be a crime?. BMJ. 2014;15:349:g4532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4532
Redman B, Caplan A. No one likes a snitch. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015;21(4):813-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9570-8
Pickett JT, Roche SP. Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(1):151-71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2
Kwan A. Chinese checkers: China sets a strong example on how to address scientific fraud. Nature [internet]. 2018 [acesso 2019 dez. 25];558:162-2. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/magazine-assets/d41586-018-05417-1/d41586-018-05417-1.pdf
Froud R, Meza TJ, Ernes KO, Slowther AM. Supervisão da ética em pesquisa na Noruega: estrutura, função e desafios. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(24): DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3816-0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Persona y Bioética
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
